Archive for the ‘Learning’ Category

Boston Pet Photography :: I like reflection shots

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009 { Bunny & Veebs, Learning }

We were arranging some stuff on the walls and had the mirror propped in the hallway for a bit. I caught Veebs catching his handsome self in the mirror, so I had to drop everything and run for the camera. I cannot resist reflection shots.

A usual evening after work, where human tries to relax on couch, and cats try to relax on human.

After I took that shot Bunny successfully overthrew Veebs from the throne, and I caught him – and his reflection against the glass coffee table – making himself more comfortable.

I had never paid attention to the reflection made against that glass. It was pretty! A mini photo-session ensued. I was also experimenting with the picture control settings on my camera. I usually shoot in “Standard” mode (equivalent of “Faithful” mode in Canons, I think) because I find “Vivid” to be way too much so for portraits, pets and people alike. The Vivid mode seems to be highly touted by other Nikon D300 users however. I think at the end of the day it’s a matter of taste. 

But I decided I’d experiment more to confirm that I didn’t like it, or find situations where Vivid mode might be more suitable to my eyes.

The below shot SOOC (straight out of the camera, no post-processing applied) in Standard mode (what I usually shoot in):

I see your true colors…

The next shot is SOOC in Vivid mode:

…screaming through

The colors coming out of Standard mode is pretty as-is in real life. But honestly, if you’re striving for creativity, “as-is” and “true to life” are not necessarily qualities what you want to convey. At times both can be really flat and BLAH. Tweaking with colors, tones, hues, among other things, can do a lot to enhance the mood of your work. I just don’t know if super-tweaking the vibrancy of the colors in these kinds of images apply, know what I mean? Maybe in landscapes. In portraits it just looks too garish.

I probably post-process my Standard shots to a level with more saturation, but not at all to the level of Vivid. It’s somewhere in the middle. Usually. Depends on the lighting situation too. And the White Balance. Damnit so many variables to consider (I’ve had this camera for 10 months now, and still there is MUCH to learn). In any case, I find it impossible to fine-tune these settings in the camera. I want to have vibrant colored portraits, but setting the Saturation just one level up produces unnaturally blood-shot skin tones. I’m going to download some additional controls here, experiment with those and see if I can’t find a happy medium. The more I do in-camera, the less I have to do off-camera.

So what do you think of the Standard vs Vivid photos above? Just curious…

Bunny thinks he doesn’t give a flip what picture mode I shoot him in, as long as I get that camera out of his face. He’s so unhelpful.

Boston Dog Photography :: Labradoodle Mania!

Thursday, June 18th, 2009 { Around Boston, Dogs, Learning, South End }

A couple of weeks ago I participated in a Super Secret Stealth Shoot on the Sly. The mission: retrieve keys, wait for humans to leave for work, enter condo, photograph the two Labradoodles inside, leave before dogwalker comes. I had major help from the sister of one of the owners, who booked the shoot. The photos are going to be a surprise engagement present for her brother and soon to be sister-in-law.

Meet doodle #1: Clyde

Doodles

Clyde is 2 years old and is sparkling white. His nose is brick-colored. His fur smells like fabric softener.

Meet doodle #2: Chloe

Chloe

Chloe is but a puppy at 6 months old. She is more apricot in color than Clyde and has much less curl.  She’s got this impossibly buttony black button nose that reminds me of some Pixar animated character.

Clyde and Chloe had a jolly time hanging out on the bed. Hopefully owners didn’t come home and wonder why the sheets were a) so rumpled and b) smeared with American cheese.

To get these shots, I wedged myself between the bed and the wall, knees bent – there was maybe only 2 feet of space – and set my 17-55mm lens all the way to WIDE. I scooched as far back as I could so that I was pretty much crumpled against the wall like a stuffed doll that had been unceremoniously tossed from the bed. And I did it all for the light. It was an overcast day, and what meager light we were getting was coming in from the window directly above me.

Doodles

The dogs’ human aunt E.  joined me in this tiny space, and together we sat squished side-by-side, me shooting away while E. smeared Kraft American cheese on their noses, dangled more cheese above the camera, and baby-talked right into my ear. The dogs clamored to get closer. I strained to back up more as my camera strained to focus on such close, quivering subjects. E. continued enticing them with cheese and cooing next to my ear. The dogs inched even closer. I could no longer hold still because my neck started to kill and I was laughing so hard.  I was imagining one of the owners unexpectedly coming home, walking into the bedroom, and seeing two dogs hovering over the edge of the bed as two girls huddled together on the floor, one with a handful of cheese and the other with a giant camera.

Doodles

Say CHEESE PLEASE!

I LOVED how involved E. was during the shoot. It’s always great when I get assistance from owners. After all, they know what makes their dogs tick more than I do! Not only does it make my job easier, it makes it that much more fun. I think back to my very first shoots when I didn’t want or ask for assistance, mostly because I was really self-conscious, nervous, didn’t know what I was doing, or all of the above. My God I was SO self-conscious. I remember my first shoot – and it was for a good friend’s dog, pro bono, as practice – thinking, Am I *seriously* trying to photograph this dog PROFESSIONALLY? What does that even mean? Hi I look and feel stupid. I’d just randomly fire away and hope for the best.

Truth is I do still “randomly” fire away to get the absolute candid shots. But it’s definitely a strategic kind of random, if that makes any sense. I’m doing a lot of crouching and moving around and recomposing, and am always aware of what’s going on around me – light, backgrounds, colors, textures, etc. I still have lots to learn, but I feel I am seriously getting so much better at this. There’s still that breathless flutter of nerves before each shoot, because I want everything to go well, naturally. But I am no longer self-conscious. Can’t tell you how liberating that feels. And I do feel I know what I’m doing, or at the very least I have a battle plan for each shoot (whether or not it goes accordingly is not always the case, but that’s okay!). As I do more, I am finding that I’ve been balancing the true candids with a lot more staged shots in order to get more interesting compositions, or ones that I’m envisioning in my head pre-shoot.

Anyway, back to our featured pooches!

Clyde and Chloe are BFFs.

Doodles

I love the below image. A staged shot turned candid.  Chloe is making sure that Clyde’s still there.

Doodles

Now for some pure candids. Dogs looks so vicious when they’re playing!

Doodles

Doodles

Chloe: IMAGONNAEATCHOO!
Clyde: *sob*

After an hour or so hanging out at the house, we headed outside to pick up a third doodle who was waiting patiently to join the party.

Meet doodle #3: Moose (center)

Doodles

Doodles

Moose is E.’s own dog and blood brother of Clyde. He is an apricot. They make quite the dashing duo.

We made a stop at the dog playground, where the exuberant Chloe tested every toy there and was gone with the wind.

Doodles

Doodles

I particularly loved this shoot because of the location as well – the South End. My neighborhood! Chloe and Clyde’s home was only 2 streets down from mine. It took a total of 60 seconds for me to walk there. Yay! And I hope you will agree, we live in quite a pretty neighbood, filled with brick and wrought iron, cobblestone pathways and hidden alleyways. It is so very urban, so very Bostonian.

Doodles

HOWEVER, if you’re going to shoot in the city, make sure you don’t schedule the session on trash pick-up day, the way I did. Oops. I strategically framed shots along the street so you wouldn’t see the bags of trash lining the curb.

Doodles

Clyde and Chloe stepped aside briefly so we could get some solo portraits of Moose.

Moose Doodles

When humans are caught blinking on camera, I give those photos the heave-ho. But when puppies are caught blinking, I give those photos a 5-star rating. Why is that?

And it’s a wrap!

Doodles

I’d like to think they’re all congratulating each other for a shoot well done.

We end with what’s becoming a favorite shot of mine: dog against red-orange door.

Doodles

I so enjoyed this shoot – great dogs, great human assistance, great location (I want to do more urban shoots please. Beacon Hill and Back Bay-ers, call me!). I hope Clyde and Chloe’s parents enjoy their gift!

“a boat,” “the Times” interchangeable

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009 { Learning, Q&A }

The craziest thing happened last week. Rik Fairlie, a contributor to the NYTimes.com personal tech blog section called Gadgetwise, contacted me. First he said Hi. Then How are you. Then he asked if I had any tips on taking good pet photos. And then he inquired whether or not I’d be willing to share those tips in an “informal” Q&A for the blog.

I thought, !!!!!

Do I have tips? Um, maybe? I think I got some tips? I’ve got some here in my back pocket, and maybe some more at the bottom of my purse….rummage rummage rummage.

But I mean really, for the New York freaking Times, I’ll make up as many tips as you need.

So here’s some insight to how I shoot. A lot of it might seem obvious or easy, but then again if that were so, there’d be a lot more pet/children photographers out there.

No, I’m not a self-proclaimed expert.

But yes I am totally passionate about what I do, have learned some things in my short tenure so far as a “professional,” and I am trying to get better every day.

And no, the 17-55mm is not a kit lens. Seventeen to fifty-five people, not eighteen to fifty-five. f-stop 2.8, mkay (had to clarify, just had to).

However YES, I totally submitted a blurry photo to the Times.

The point is: Good photography – wedding, travel, baby, pet or otherwise – is not lazy. It’s not all about the camera body, it’s not about standing around waiting for Something to Happen. It’s all deliberate, it’s all work, even – and especially? – the candid ones.

And this is kind of how I feel about the whole interview going up:
(link to video here)

Thanks Rik for the write-up! Sha-day!

Maybe it doesn’t look it, but seriously. It keeps getting better.

Monday, April 27th, 2009 { Learning, Personal, Rescue Me }

Today I have been married to Daniel for seven consecutive years.

In total, it’s been over 10 years of an interdependent partnership in which both parties claim equal stake.


This partnership reached its pinnacle this weekend in Providence, RI, where we were scouting locations for an upcoming shoot.

I made him pose for me as a dog.

And he did such a lovely job. Right? Baha.

Fat Orange Cat Studio is just one of the many things in my life that he helps make possible. And fun.

I’m a very lucky girl.

(Whether or not he’s a lucky boy is up for debate…)

P.S. I’m still trying out new design templates for images processed for the blog. Decided to go with rounded corners which is in keeping with the rounded corners in the square of my logo. Just simple things to keep the design consistent and thus, reinforce the branding!

Photos shot in front of the First Baptist Meeting House, Providence Superior Court, and colorful doors of the beautiful colonial homes lining Benefit Street. I heart you Providence! And you too Dan!

What was bad is good again

Friday, March 13th, 2009 { Dogs, Learning }

I’m in the process of designing layouts for a book of the dogs and cats I’ve so far photographed. I had considered and then unconsidered offering books because they are so time consuming to make and thus would have to be rather pricey. But I figure if I bring a sample with me to the Pawsh grand opening party, use it as both a portfolio and possible product offering, have people be able to see it and touch it…it couldn’t hurt, right?

If nothing else, I’ll have made a nice coffee table book for myself.

So I’m going through all my dog photos and some are looking fresh and new again to my eyes. Photos that were flagged as “rejected” are now “picked.” This is why I have such a hard time deleting images forever, and why I have 2 terabytes of external hard drives to back up my files. It’s out of control. You never know, with the passage of time and a pair of fresh eyes, something that was bad might become good again.

Like these blurry oops! photos. This one of Bob the Boston cracks me up everytime I see it.

Bahaha!  Is that Bob or is that the littlest black and white shark in a sea of chum? He’s been churned up into such a state of frenzy. I like how despite the blur you can still make out his markings. In fact they might even be magnified now. Rrrrr rrrr rrrr!

Another blurry shot of Sadie the Springer:

Tossing her lovely locks about, pink tongue on the move!

Then there are these overexposed shots that I’m really liking.

I took this shot of Lola the Springer indoors, at night. A lamp was behind her right side, so part of her head is backlit, while the other is underexposed. I bumped up the exposure compensation and shot wide open. I didn’t like how it turned out, but once I switched it to black and white, oooo! So moody. So romantic. She just might be selling perfume.

Also, I heart negative space!

Sadie again, totally blown out. We had just stepped outside, a bright sunny day, and I shot with my camera still on indoor settings. I didn’t give this a second look until just now in Lightroom, where I increased the blacks and added a some sharpening. I think I might love it. A lot. Dog in negative space, yum.  And you can still make out the anticipation on her face.

I’m loving the potential of imperfect shots that turn into something much more interesting!